• HOME
    • SITEMAP
  • ABOUT ICFP
    • MISSION & VALUES
      • EQUITY
      • EFFICIENCY
      • ADEQUACY
      • STABILITY
    • ADVISORY COMMITTEE
    • STAFF
  • INFORMATION & ANALYSIS
    • IDAHO CENTER FOR FISCAL POLICY REPORTS
    • OTHER STUDIES & REPORTS
    • NEWS & OPINION
    • COMMENTARY
    • ICFP IN THE NEWS
    • EVENTS
    • LINKS
  • DONATIONS
  • CONTACT ICFP
Layout Image

CANDIDATES MORE IN FAVOR OF A TAX INCREASE LIMITATION REQUIREMENT THAN FOR ONE ON FEE INCREASES

May 2, 2012

Mitch Coffman:  During the 2012 legislative session, House Joint Resolution 1 was introduced, proposing an amendment to the Idaho Constitution requiring that any tax increase or fee increase would need a two-thirds vote of both houses in the Legislature for a tax or fee increase. It received mixed reviews when it was presented in committee, and ultimately didn’t go anywhere.

The resolution said that no bill providing for a net increase in revenue to the state, by fees or taxes, can become law unless two-thirds of both houses approve it.

The resolution was defeated on two grounds of reasoning. First, that it did not provide a clear definition of what constitutes a net increase in revenue and, second, a number of lawmakers were not willing to consider a tax increase and a fee increase in the same resolution. That is, many more favored such a limit on tax increases, but were hesitant when it came to fee increases.

Categories : News & Opinion
older post
newer post

Comments are closed.

News & Opinion

  • A SALES TAX EXEMPTION FOR ANTI-ABORTION RESOURCE CLINICS PASSES THE IDAHO HOUSE
  • CRABB: A FEDERAL EXCHANGE WILL BRING MORE COMPETITION TO IDAHO
  • IDAHO EDUCATION REFORM BILLS APPROVED IN SENATE COMMITTEE
  • MINI-CASSIA OFFICIALS: FIGHT REPEAL OF PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX
  • MANY OF IDAHO’S TOP BUSINESS PROPERTY TAX PAYERS KEEP MUM ON PUSH FOR REPEAL
  • IDAHO FARM LEADERS KEEP AN EYE ON TAX REPEAL EFFORT
 Subscribe to ICFP's COMMENTARY

Commentary

  • APRIL 2013 IDAHO GENERAL FUND REVENUE UPDATE
  • PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION PROPOSAL
  • IDAHO PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION REPORT
  • EDUCATION FUNDING OP-ED
  • IDAHO FALLS CITY CLUB – SEPT 21, 2012
  • IDAHO GENERAL FUND – AUGUST 2012 UPDATE

ICFP In The News

  • MANY OF IDAHO’S TOP BUSINESS PROPERTY TAX PAYERS KEEP MUM ON PUSH FOR REPEAL
  • VIDEO: MIKE FERGUSON ‘MORE THAN HAPPY’ TO PROVIDE FACT-BASED ANALYSIS TO IDAHO LAWMAKERS
  • MAP: WHO BENEFITS MOST IF IDAHO’S BUSINESS PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX IS ELIMINATED
  • IDAHO NEEDS TO HONOR ITS CONSTITUTION
  • OUR VIEW: A TAX SUBSIDY IDAHO’S SCHOOLS CANNOT AFFORD
| HOME | ABOUT ICFP | INFORMATION & ANALYSIS | DONATIONS | CONTACT ICFP | SITEMAP |
Idaho Center for Fiscal Policy
Copyright © 2011-2013 All Rights Reserved
Powered by WordPress
Designed by Virtually Everything