• HOME
    • SITEMAP
  • ABOUT ICFP
    • MISSION & VALUES
      • EQUITY
      • EFFICIENCY
      • ADEQUACY
      • STABILITY
    • ADVISORY COMMITTEE
    • STAFF
  • INFORMATION & ANALYSIS
    • IDAHO CENTER FOR FISCAL POLICY REPORTS
    • OTHER STUDIES & REPORTS
    • NEWS & OPINION
    • COMMENTARY
    • ICFP IN THE NEWS
    • EVENTS
    • LINKS
  • DONATIONS
  • CONTACT ICFP
Layout Image

A SALES TAX EXEMPTION FOR ANTI-ABORTION RESOURCE CLINICS PASSES THE IDAHO HOUSE

February 12, 2013

Emilie Ritter Saunders reports:  A bill that would give a sales tax exemption to pregnancy resource clinics that don’t offer abortion services has passed the House. In a 58-12 vote, Idaho lawmakers approved Rep. Kelley Packer’s (R-McCammon) proposal.

Packer introduced the bill on behalf of Boise’sStanton Healthcare, after the organization purchased two ultrasound machines and were charged a sales tax. The organization didn’t think it should be subject to sales tax because it is a non-profit, and because it’s a health related entity, which are largely tax exempt in Idaho.

“That little amount of money to the state creates a huge concern for them,” Packer says. According to Packer, Stanton’s tax bill on the ultrasound machines was $6,000.

Rep. Grant Burgoyne (D-Boise) says the Legislature shouldn’t make policy based on one organization’s misunderstanding of the law. “We’re backing our way into a policy because someone got caught up in a mistake,” Burgoyne says.

More than one lawmaker, including Burgoyne, suggested maybe it’s time Idaho look at the sales tax policy, and perhaps broaden exemptions to include all non-profits, rather than selecting exempt entities piecemeal.

“There are many other organizations that are also worthy of an exemption,” Burgoyne added. “Clinics that deal with the mentally ill, those who deal with suicide issues, those who deal with things like Alzheimer’s and diabetes and nutrition.”

It’s unclear how much sales tax revenue Idaho stands to lose if this exemption becomes law. Rep. Packer’s bill estimates the state could lose $10,000 annually.

The tax exemption proposal now heads to the Senate for consideration.

Categories : News & Opinion
older post
newer post

Comments are closed.

News & Opinion

  • A SALES TAX EXEMPTION FOR ANTI-ABORTION RESOURCE CLINICS PASSES THE IDAHO HOUSE
  • CRABB: A FEDERAL EXCHANGE WILL BRING MORE COMPETITION TO IDAHO
  • IDAHO EDUCATION REFORM BILLS APPROVED IN SENATE COMMITTEE
  • MINI-CASSIA OFFICIALS: FIGHT REPEAL OF PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX
  • MANY OF IDAHO’S TOP BUSINESS PROPERTY TAX PAYERS KEEP MUM ON PUSH FOR REPEAL
  • IDAHO FARM LEADERS KEEP AN EYE ON TAX REPEAL EFFORT
 Subscribe to ICFP's COMMENTARY

Commentary

  • APRIL 2013 IDAHO GENERAL FUND REVENUE UPDATE
  • PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION PROPOSAL
  • IDAHO PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION REPORT
  • EDUCATION FUNDING OP-ED
  • IDAHO FALLS CITY CLUB – SEPT 21, 2012
  • IDAHO GENERAL FUND – AUGUST 2012 UPDATE

ICFP In The News

  • MANY OF IDAHO’S TOP BUSINESS PROPERTY TAX PAYERS KEEP MUM ON PUSH FOR REPEAL
  • VIDEO: MIKE FERGUSON ‘MORE THAN HAPPY’ TO PROVIDE FACT-BASED ANALYSIS TO IDAHO LAWMAKERS
  • MAP: WHO BENEFITS MOST IF IDAHO’S BUSINESS PERSONAL PROPERTY TAX IS ELIMINATED
  • IDAHO NEEDS TO HONOR ITS CONSTITUTION
  • OUR VIEW: A TAX SUBSIDY IDAHO’S SCHOOLS CANNOT AFFORD
| HOME | ABOUT ICFP | INFORMATION & ANALYSIS | DONATIONS | CONTACT ICFP | SITEMAP |
Idaho Center for Fiscal Policy
Copyright © 2011-2013 All Rights Reserved
Powered by WordPress
Designed by Virtually Everything